DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
ELP
Docket No. 2198-99
20 August 1999
I~ear~1~iii
This is in reference to your application for, correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
~States Code, Section 1552.
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 18 August 1999.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on
9 December 1986 for five years at age 19.
that you were promoted to CPL (E-4) and served for nearly 21
months without incident.
from November 1988 to May 1990 you received four nonjudicial
punishment (NJPs).
appointed place of duty, a 16 hour period of unauthorized
absence, disrespect and failure to obey a lawful order.
However, during the 18 month period
The record reflects
The offenses consisted of absence from your
The record further reflects that on 11 June 1991 the commanding
officer (CO) commented on the Career Planning Con.trabt Record
that you had matured since Desert Storm/Shield and were a hard
worker.
conducted on 26 September 1991 by the career planner noted that
you had decided to get out at the expiration of your enlistment
and were planning to attend junior college.
The career planner
noted that although you were recommended for reenlistment in June
You were recommended for reenlistment.
An interview
1991 by your previous CO, you were ineligible due to the four
NJPs and should receive an RE-3C reenlistment code.
the current CO recommended you for reenlistment and assignment of
a RE-3C reenlistment code.
You were then informed that this code
was being assigned since four NJPs made you ineligible for
reenlistment.
for reenlistment.
There is no evidence that you submitted a request
Thereafter,
On 8 December 1991, you were honorably released from active duty,
transferred to the Marine Corps Reserve, and assigned an RE-3C
reenlistment code.
An RE-3C
Regulations provide that individuals with more than two NJPs are
ineligible for reenlistment without CMC’s approval.
reenlistment code is assigned when directed by Commandant of the
Marine Corps (CMC), or when an individual is not eligible for
reenlistment and the disqualifying factor is not covered by any
Your contentions to the effect that your DD Form 214
other code.
contains no remarks to justify the assigned reenlistment code and
the career planner never considered your CO’s recommendation are
without merit.
recommended you for reenlistment.
assigned by the CO, not by the career planner.
planner only pointed out to the CO that since you were
recommended for reenlistment, you rated an RE—3C reenlistment
code and not an RE-4.
code was proper and no change is warranted. Accordingly, your
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The record clearly indicates that both CO’s
The Board concluded that the reenlistment
The reenlistment code was
The career
The names and votes of the members
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
You are entitled to have the
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02198-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 1999. The career planner noted that although you were recommended for reenlistment in June 1991 by your previous CO, you were ineligible due to the four NJPs and should receive an RE-3C reenlistment code. The reenlistment code was assigned by the CO, not by the career planner.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03093-01
3093-01 15 October 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 11 October 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The fact...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04067-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 1999. An RE-30 reenlistment code may be assigned to career Marines who receive PCS orders but refuse to extend or reenlist in order to obtain sufficient obligated service to carry out those orders. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05583-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1001/ 1 MMEA-6 of 17 February 1999, a copy of which is attached. - On 7 April 1997, u r n t e His current reenlistment was r enlistment contract was a probationary reenlistment contract.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01964-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Control (ECFC) policy, According to the Enlisted Career Force sergeants who have twice failed selection to the next higher grade must leave active duty at he end of active service sergeant twice and was therefore denied further service. in order...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02098-00
Your request to enter a “CD” (change of duty) fitness report for 9 March to 10 April 1991, reflecting service in combat with the primary duty of adjutant, could not be considered, as you did not provide such a report. the Reporting Senior's actions in 3c is in no way an invalidating factor in Reference (b) did not contain a very filling out Item 3c and Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05189-08
Sincerely, LN a © W. DEAN PFEIFF Executive Dire Enclosures DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TIR Docket No: 5189-08 7 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj}: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. In his application, Petitioner contends that he was misdiagnosed with a personality and adjustment disorder and that the Marine Corps made poor decisions based on his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04755-01
It is noted that CMC has corrected your reenlistment code to RE-3C. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09442-02
At that time you were not recommended for reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Apparently, your record has been corrected to reflect this At that time, you had completed almost four years of About a year later, you received RE-3C reenlistment code may be However, the decision On 7 October 1998 you were The punishment imposed whether or not to grant a waiver is a matter within the sole discretion of recruiting authorities. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07570-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. is the payment method that was in effect at the time of Corporal ,w reenlistment.